Why Multimillionaire Author Bill Perkins Says Parents Should Hand Out Inheritances in Their Twenties
The traditional approach to family wealth planning usually involves passing down an inheritance after death. However, hedge fund multimillionaire and author Bill Perkins argues that this conventional method often delivers funds far too late in life to make a meaningful difference for the recipients. According to Perkins, author of “Die with Zero: Getting All You Can from Your Money and Your Life,” parents who intend to provide financial support to their children should consider distributing those funds while their offspring are still young enough to maximize the utility of the money.
During an appearance on Fortune Daily hosted by Ellie Austin, Perkins outlined a strategy where parents place intended inheritance funds into a trust, distributing the assets to their children when they are between the ages of 28 and 33. He points out that human mental acuity reaches its peak around age 28 on average, and begins a plateau and decline phase starting around age 33. By timing the financial transfer to align with these years, the funds arrive when the utility of money is exceptionally high and before the seasons of a recipient’s life pass them by.
While Perkins’ broader philosophy advocates for spending or giving away all personal wealth before dying, he emphasizes that the “Die with Zero” framework explicitly includes ensuring that children are properly supported. In his book, he shares the perspective of Virginia Colin, a woman who struggled financially while raising four children alone after a divorce. Although her mother possessed significant financial resources, Colin did not receive her $130,000 inheritance until she was 49 years old—long after she had remarried and moved past the edge of poverty. Colin noted that receiving those funds much earlier in life would have provided significantly more value.
Perkins’ perspective challenges the status quo, citing data from the Federal Reserve Board indicating that the most common age for individuals to receive an inheritance is 60. Waiting until death to distribute wealth leaves the timing entirely to chance, reducing the likelihood that the financial support will arrive precisely when a younger generation faces their steepest economic challenges. Furthermore, holding wealth until the end of life increases the statistical odds that parents might outlive some of their children.
This discussion on inheritance timing emerges during a period when younger demographics encounter unprecedented hurdles in achieving traditional financial milestones. Federal Reserve Board data and market conditions highlight that roughly half of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 currently live with their parents. Meanwhile, fluctuating mortgage rates hovering near 7% have pushed homeownership further out of reach, contributing to a rise in the median age of a first-time homebuyer to 40 last year, compared to 28 in 1991. Additionally, persistent inflation remaining above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target rate and recent interest rate adjustments continue to squeeze household budgets.
Providing funds during a recipient’s twenties or early thirties allows them to utilize the inheritance for critical early-life investments, such as securing a down payment on a home or paying off student loans. Perkins contends that relying on the traditional bequest model is often an autopilot decision passed down across generations rather than a deliberate strategy designed to optimize the well-being of one’s children.
Key Takeaways on Early Inheritances
- Bill Perkins suggests placing inheritance funds in a trust to distribute to children between ages 28 and 33.
- Data cited from the Federal Reserve Board shows the typical inheritance age is currently 60, which Perkins argues is often too late to transform a recipient’s life.
- Younger generations face high economic hurdles, including rising homebuyer median ages and elevated mortgage rates, making early financial support more impactful.
Source: Fortune